African ports strained due to Red Sea crisis 

African ports struggle with cargo influx as companies reroute around the Cape of Good Hope to avoid the Red Sea.

The Red Sea crisis has created a ripple effect, causing a surge in vessel calls and congestion at African ports in the last quarter of 2023.

As a response to the heightened number of attacks by Yemen’s Houthis in the Red Sea, numerous shipping companies are rerouting their ships to the Cape of Good Hope on Africa’s southern tip.

The trip adds around 3,000 nautical miles and days (if not, weeks) to the sailing times of vessels together with higher fuel expenses and maintenance requirements.

At the same time, the demand surge at African ports has pointed to the widening efficiency gap between African ports and other global regions.

“The Red Sea crisis is highlighting the wide gap in efficiency between ports in Africa and other world regions, despite heavy investment in port infrastructure on the continent over the past decades, particularly under China’s Belt and Road program,” Turloch Mooney, Global Head of Port Intelligence & Analytics at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said.

Despite this growth, several terminals in Africa found themselves grappling with the escalating demands, leading to extended ship waiting times and a decline in ocean and yard productivity across many key ports.

Based on a report from S&P Global Market Intelligence, in the fourth quarter of 2023, business at the main African container ports witnessed a year-over-year improvement, marked by substantial growth in vessel calls and container movements. While this surge reflected a positive trend for the region, it concurrently posed challenges to terminal and port infrastructure.

Overall, the port productivity in Africa experienced a significant setback, plunging by more than 18%, primarily attributed to a pronounced deterioration in vessel waiting times. Noteworthy exceptions to this trend were observed at the ports of Tanger-Med and Mombasa, which not only defied the prevailing challenges but managed to enhance productivity despite a notable increase in container volumes.

However, the general yard productivity at the main African ports witnessed a decline during Q4 2023. Import container dwell times increased by almost 10%, reaching 5.4 days, while export container dwell times surged by nearly 90%, exceeding 8.5 days, the report said.

The consequences of these inefficiencies were reflected in the World Bank–S&P Global Market Intelligence Container Port Performance Index, where almost one-third of the bottom 50 ports were situated in Sub-Saharan Africa, underscoring the persistent challenges impeding the region’s trade sector development and hindering aspirations for more significant involvement in international supply chains.

Source: World Cargo website – 7 March 2024

Global container ports could handle 840m TEU a year by 2018

singapore-port

Port of Singapore

Projected throughput four years from now compares with 642m teu in 2013 and 674m teu projected for this year. The 2018 projection is double the 2004 throughput figure of 363m teu.

The combination of faster traffic growth and strong profit levels is attracting aggressive new players to enter the container terminal-operator business , according to the 11th Global Container Terminal Operators Annual Review and Forecast report published by shipping consultancy Drewry. It says Africa and Greater China are the regions that will see the most rapid growth.

Overall , growth rates are expected to average an annual 5.6% in the five years to 2018, compared with 3.4% in 2013. That will boost average terminal utilisation from 67% today to 75% in 2018, Drewry forecasts.

“The sector’s strong financial performance and accelerating growth is encouraging new market entrants and renewed merger and acquisition activity in the container ports sector,” said Neil Davidson, senior analyst in Drewry’s ports and terminals practice. “Financial investors are particularly active at present, attracted by typical ebitda margins of between 20% and 45%.”

Drewry has also added two companies to its league table of 24 terminal operators it considers to be global. Both China Merchants Holdings International and Bolloré Group have been growing aggressively. In the case of CMHI further acquisitions are particularly likely. Other operators, such as Gulftainer and Yilport are also expanding rapidly and are challenging for inclusion in Drewry’s league table.

The composition of the top five players, when measured on an equity teu throughput basis, has changed little from last year, except new entrant CMHI which is now in fifth place. PSA again heads the table, by virtue of its scale and 20% stake in Hutchison Port Holdings which comes second. APM Terminals is third, followed by DP World.

Drewry said that by 2018, it expects both HPH and APM Terminals to be vying closely for the top spot in terms of capacity deployed. Most portfolio expansion will be through greenfield or brownfield terminals in emerging markets, led by APM Terminals, International Container Terminal Services, HPH and DP World. “All port and terminal operators are experiencing a number of key industry trends, some of which have wide ramifications,” said Mr Davidson. “The most important trends are deployment of ever-larger containerships, expansion of shipping-line alliances, financial pressures on shipping lines, rapidly emerging international terminal operators and owners, financial investor churn, as well as the gathering pace of terminal automation.” Source: Lloydslist.com